Notes for lecture 16 - May 20

 

 

  1. Norton - Chapter 7 - Community Values
  2. theme for the day - Why is important to have this philosophical grounding?

 

1. Norton Chapter 7:

Norton

a. Tragedy of the Commons

state the TotC from multiple perspectives

as economic problem

from a perspective of scale

discover a value that is lost in when you use individual based methods, which is community values

represents more than the sum of individual utilities

emergent, i.e. doesn't exist at the level of the individual

solutions

privatization

  • necessary - no, there are other solutions
  • sufficient - whaling as an example of other forces at work

 

 

b. What form of governance can be used with adaptive management

goal is social learning

ecological problems can't be solved with market competition

reducing all values to one dimension

focus on cooperation

central problem is still that we need the language to address these problems

Norton suggests a method:

  • pluralism - seeking many different views
  • contextual - assigning weights
    • discussion of the assignment of weights
    • discussion of the indices used - anyone can propose another one
  • procedural norms - participants have to commit to cooperate
  • action and reflection
  • attention to communal goals

can we rely on democracy?

first, realize that some strong hierarchy/policy choices are anti-democratic

 

c. cooperative behavior and co-evolution

co-evolutionary development is very different than growth through progress

Norgaard 1994

 

 

d. Discourse

entering to a discussion to solve a problem using normal, community language

commitment to deliberate rather than use force

process is independent of beliefs and values of participants

accept preconditions of rational speech

the process has to develop trust

Fukuyama - Trust

Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

network - purpose of networks

different types of networks in different phases of community development

 

e. Experimental approach to environmental values

according to EPA - values should be negotiated politically and by policy makers

Norton proposes an experimental approach

community, inhabited by diverse groups, engage in improving their environment

evaluation (not assiging a value) can have multiple dimensions

triple bottom line

set up indices and debate on those is very concrete

how we are going to know that we made progress

preferences (beginning - felt, after deliberation - considered)

opens up consideration of social learning

role for social sciences

study the instituions that help create cooperation (Elinor Ostrom)

understand how to create processes (social) that support enviornmental improvement

  • goverance
  • policy creation
  • review of these processes by scientists and community

can be formulated as experimental questions in social sciences

  • deliberative democracy experiments (The Economist May 8th, 2010, page 62)
    • select individuals out of a larger group
    • have them study the problem, they change their ming
  • experiments in developing countries with community voting vs. elites
    • work of Benjamin Olken
    • villages operating differently, so could compare
    • same decision, but people were more satisfied
    • Technology Review, May/June 2010 pg m8

 

2. Theme

trying to align the philosophy, method and the environmental approach

Why is it important to be personally, internally consistent
when in contrast we want a pluralistic society?

For example:

What's the problem if you believe in democracy AND strong environmental policies that are imposed on people?

What if you believe there is a "correct answer" but enter into a process that's designed to educate and discuss an issue? You believe that if people are better educated, they'll pick your answer.

 

3. Assignment 3 on your "classic"

crucial points for rest of class