http://web.pdx.edu/~rueterj/courses/ESM102/week10.html

Week 10

Overview

  • Solving environmental problems
    • MPF
    • innovation
    • small scale - entrepreneurism
  • Integrative review
  • course evaluation forms (10 to 15 minutes)

 

1. Lecture notes

A. review MPF

Purpose: to gather broad input, aggressively pluralistic approach to the problem definition

Should help to avoid traps and suprises

Allows diverse teams to address the problem

  • diverse skills (instrumental diversity)
  • diverse values (fundamental preference diversity)
  • Page's superadditivity principle
    • a diverse team will beat an individual specialist/high-performer ($$$)
  • Authentic problem will bring the team together

 

B. Innovation

 

B1. What drives the need for innovation?

The problems that we face are:

  • complex (multiple parts)
    • example: many different people with different views interacting to address a problem
  • human control
    • > 50% of the Earth's primary productivity is controlled by humans
    • can't rely on the resiliency or buffering of nature
  • tipping points - thresholds

Homer-Dixon calls this problem the "Ingenuity Gap"

New problems of our own making, such as

  • DDT
  • CFC's
  • dams

Old problems with new dimensions

  • firewood, competition for biofuel, respiratory diseases

 

B2. Innovation includes technology AND institutions

new technologies or ways of using energy

  • solar panels in the neighborhood
  • batteries
  • switches for managing load, putting power on the grid, local storage

require new institutions/organizations

  • "Smart Grid"
  • localized power with willing customers/suppliers
    • home solar
    • wind turbines
  • batteries
    • such as plug in EV
    • banks of batteries in a warehous
  • cooperation by industries
    • turn off power or reduce consumption during peak load
    • contract for power costs that is mutually beneficial

 

B3. Example of "combinatorial" innovation

 

C. Taking action, with small scale entrepreneurial action

 

C1. Sometimes small scale actions are more effective

entrepreneurism can step in when there is a failure of the government or market to meet the needs of people

may be specific requirements

    • unique local geographic or social conditions
    • unique local requirements
    • craft rather than industry approach

    may be more effective because individuals are involved

    • many people doing specific tasks

    may be financially effective

    • decreased power used to control the processes
      • power goes up exponentially to control larger operations (Adams)
    • decreased logistic costs
    • decreased medium-term risk
      • as compared to large projects
      • sawtooth of payment and return rather than one big payment (Lovins)

    may be better just because problems with large alternatives

     

C2. Examples

ecosystem restoration that relies on removing invasives

small, distributed power plants that are brought on-line as demand grows

demographic transition - fertility phase (compared to mortality phase which could be from a larger scale public works project)

 

C3. Operationally - what works

keystone species examples

  • elephants knocking down trees - intermediate disturbance
  • alligators creating wallows
  • bats dispersing seeds for mangroves

operation principles

  • look at overall rules of the system
  • near tipping point or at the very least, positive feedback
  • control with requisite complexity (match control system to controlled system)

manage for health and resilience

  • best opportunities are development, not reclaimation
  • eco-tipping points
  • system builds itself back to health with minimum intervention

examples:

  • marine reserves that preserve biodiversity and increase fisheries yield
  • early season control by daphnia, may eliminate blooms (graph)
  • marsh spreading with ILP (picture)
  • organizing social movement through small groups (participation-threshold)

 

D. What can we do? (Review) - this will be the focus of assessment 10

  • IPAT
  • Everything is connected
  • positive and negative feedback
  • accounting to support decisions
  • address risk and uncertainty in the future
  • understanding worldviews

 

I=PAT

    • interaction between these components
    • higher affluence (spend more) to have less impact
    • create wealth that is better for the environment

Everything is connected

 

Positive and negative feedback

 

Accounting to support decisions

 

Address risk and uncertainty in the future

 

Understand worldviews

 

Multiple perpectives

    • include values from the beginning
    • rigorous intellectual tools
    • identify unintended consequences, embedded resources
    • be careful to avoid thresholds for downward spiral

Innovation and Entrepreneurism may be required

  • technology AND institutions
  • appropriate risk and rewards that allow individuals to benefit from innovations
  • permission to learn from mistakes
 
 

 

 

 

2. In class assessment and feedback

The question was to analyze the world view that Homer-Dixon was using when he claims that humans are creating environmental problems faster than we are solving them.

How might the problem be posed differently from other world views?

What can you learn from this comparison?

 

 

3. Reading in "Multiple Perspectives" text

Chapter 12: Multiple Perspectives Framework

Chapter 13: Innovation

Chapter 15: Engagement and Environmental Entrepreneurial Solutions (notes)

 

4. Reading from Wikipedia or Encyclopedia of Earth


none

 

 

5. On-line activities:

Videos:

none - lost the link


Simulations:

none

 

Case study or Example:

combinatorial innovation

 

6. Learning objectives:

week 10 learning objectives

 

7. Link to the on-line assignment:

go to D2L

 

 

 
 

last edited by John Rueter on Wed, March 14, 2012