sustainability/multiple-models.html
2006.02.12
Each underlying model leads to its own set of claims.
a. A sustainable system will read a steady state.
equilibrium system
output or harvest has to be limited to input or growth
b.Any system of production and consumption will naturally pulse.
system away from equilibrium
growth or accumulation of a resource will be used most efficiently by consumers
leads to pulsing
looks like predator-prey interactions
requires different plans for what to do during the declining resource periods
Odum and Odum, Prigogine
c. Sustainability needs to be considered across multiple time and space scales.
multiscale view
Panarchy
resiliency cycle at individual scales are linked
interplay between fast and slow processes are key to be resilient
Gunderson and Hollings
d. The situation of "sustainability" is an emergent property of a complex system.
the outcome of the overall system can't be determined by setting goals at the lower level
conditions that promote cooperativity are crucial
I won't go into this argument here. Proceed as if it were true, what it would mean for how we study and attempt to understand the condition of sustainability.
a. We need to study multiple scales and how they interact.
Panarchy approach of both landscape ecology and fast/slow regulations
b. We need to understand two things much better: time and value
Time relates to value through official, social and personal discount rates. I will deal with that after I deal with time and value separately.
a. Cultures have different views of time.
see notes from Jan 2 on Edward Hall
polychronic vs. monochronic
b. Does what we refer to as time run constantly just because we can make machines that measure even time increments?
c. understanding how to achieve sustainability will require addressing whether human time is
constant everywhere for everyone
pulsing (faster or slower)
heterogeneous (different rates at different places)
There are multiple definitions of "value" that could pertain to sustainability. See value-2systems.html
a. Alexander's definition of value
The only way to get the requisite level of complexity necessary to regulate a complex system is through an unfolding process.
The value of a process, idea or thing in this context is how it fits into supporting the sustainable "unfolding" from one step to the next.
b. relate to other definition of value from facts--> metaphors --> values
a. Whereas economists might simplify the value of something as a function of time, even using a complicated non-linear function, it is more than a substitution type relationship.
discount rate
non-linear is not the same as discontinuous version of time that seems to be held as a matter of judgement and neurobiology by humans
there are short term phenomenon and long term - and these aren't equatable
There may be an ambiguity about this that is irreducible. If so, we need a new definition of time/value.
b. Even simple discount rate considerations can be shown to undermine cooperativitity.
Evolution of cooperativity
c. Complex processes relate time and value.
rates of reactions that go through phase transition
spatial and temporal variability
asthma attacks
wetland or humock structure in a hydrological field (pond <--> labyrinth <--> islands)
d. There are crucial instants in time that determine a single sub-system's future value.
bifurcations
relate to multiple trials and unfolding
e. We need new ways to conceptualize the flow of time.
metaphors for time that aren't based on a mechanical clock image
pulsing - a time unit is the time for some part of the process to take place
when the system is changing the most - time slows down
**example
history leading to the present and determining the future - history of complex systems
**example
unfolding of processes around centers (Alexander)
origami
**example