problem-types-action.html
Table 1. Types of environmental problems and decisions.
alignment between costs and valuesgood poor simple EASY
- traditional science will work
- policies and regulations can be created
CPR
- traditional science will work
- set up institutions in the community (Ostrom)
complex INFORMATION
- problem based science (Norton)
- strong inference (Platt)
- decrease uncertainty through management actions (Norton)
- delimit interderminancy (Pahl-Wostl)
- adaptive management
WICKED
- problem based science (Norton)
- stong inference (Platt)
- post-normal science (Funtowicz and Ravetz)
- accounting for values using triple bottom line (****) or heteroglossic accounting (****)
- taking entrepreneurial action in absence of well defined institutional structure and/or shifting nature of current institutions
- participate in social entrepreneurism network
Cunningham & Saigo 2001
Funtowicz, S. and J. Ravetz. (****). Post-normal science: Environmental policy under conditions of complexity.
???? Triple bottom line.
MacIntryre??? Heteroglossic Accounting
Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Ostrom, E. (****) Governing the commons.
Ostrom, Elinor and James Walker. 1997. Neither markets nor states: Linking tranformation processes in collection action arenas. Chap 3. in Perspectives on Public Choice. Dennis C. Mueller, editor.Cambridge University Press. pages 35-72. HB 846.8 .P47 1997 (Sept 2002)
Pahl-Wostl, C. (1998). Ecosystem organization across a continuum of scales: A comparative analysis of lakes and rivers. Ecological Scale. D. L. Peterson, and V. Thomas Parker. New York, NY, Columbia University Press: 141 - 170.
Platt 1964