February 2, 2009
resource depletion models
need to have the same units for the resource as the population
doesn't work with food because of metabolic losses
we'll see that in lecture 12 "coflow models" that account for energy and material linked, yet separately
solving by inspection
critical analysis of units is a key skill
tons of food (in what time period, or is it cumulative?)
poorly written axes in the journal (pore volume / mL) "/" doesn't mean divided by
equation - should have all the information
time axis (years AD, years_before_present, years_since_1950) etc
see Lecture 6
example of birth rate vs. death rate relationships
what if the reproductive rate is slow at low populations - fish densitity is too low
but increases to a maximum at higher densitities
this is called the "Allee" effect, which can make decreasing population size even worse
Students, draw a STELLA model of this ---
did it look like this?
Do some runs with STELLA model 7-new-mss
reference to recent articles on global climate change
loading up of carbon sinks, irreversibly
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/26/AR2009012602037.html
bath-tub effect
focusing on the more tractable problem with P build up in shallow lakes
stocks:
- algal_P
- soluble_P
- sediment_P
fast flows:
- soluble_P --> algal_P
- release back out of sediments at high algal concentrations
slow flows:
- build up of P in sediments
- flushing of P from lake (loss of algal_P and soluble_P due to dilution)
thresholds (positive feedbacks):
- dilution of algae out of the lake will control algae at low concentrations
- high algae will increase the flow from sediments to algae
dissect out all the parts:
- soluble_P to algal_P
- dilution loss of any thing in the lake
- driving P input
- algae loss to sinking
- sediment to burial (keeps a fixed amount in the sediment)
- return from sediment is a threshold equation
Is it:
- highest P load with lowest algal "pollution"
or
system resilience in the clear state
There is the danger of crossing the threshold
because of the cost of recovery, it would be very expensive