courses/ESR630/week4-lecture.html

Lecture 4: Considering an interdisciplinary and innovative career

Presentation

  • Assumptions:
    • ESR PhD students are likely to have careers that will draw from multiple disciplines in order to solve problems.
    • The problem of "interdiscplinarity" is actually a bigger problem in academia that it is in the other sectors.
    • Innovation may face some of the same challenges in other sectors (as interdisciplinarity does in academia).
    • Who and how knowledge is created is a legitimate concern for environmental science.

 

Why we need interdisciplinary studies and solutions

NSF report on Transitions and Tipping Points

  • from 2006/2011 strategic plan
  • integrative research that serves as a strong foundation for policy
  • need to understand transition and tipping points will require multiscale approaches
  • increasing stress + little time + need for new science that provides solutions
  • high priority for NSF is the IGERT program
  • networked research
  • other good examples: MEA and decision theater

Discuss:

  • "integrative" vs. multiple valid perspectives
  • network - how do they really work
    • people have to have an authentic stake in the outcome
    • depend on trust
    • digital & vitrual tools - do they work?

 

Challenges to interdisciplinary academic career

  • hiring and review at universities
    • Pfirman 2005, only 16% had policies in place for hiring and promotion
    • may hire between disciplines but the review for tenure depends on disciplinary criteria
    • tenure committee - does it include an outside reviewer
    • criteria for how the reviews take place are critical (joint committee, etc.)
    • SoE by-laws say that faculty are only considered for tenure in one department, i.e. their home department
    • CEDD report
      • structural
      • institutional acceptance
      • a different search process, more people involved
      • early career development - such as networking
      • 3rd year and tenure review criteria
      • senior faculty development rewards above department level
  • research
    • networking costs - need to establish collaborations and have them come to fruition in < 6 years
  • teaching
    • co-teaching a course actually requires more total work than if one person teaches it. Does the university really want inter-disc courses?
    • may require different pedagogy
  • service
    • small programs have high overhead that falls to new faculty (my study on small department issues)
    • interdisc facuty are valuable on university committees (as are women and minorities) - can lead to "extra" committee work
      • more women and minorities attracted to interdisc areas

 

Career paths

  • Individual choices
  • interdisciplinary is "less efficient" in terms of publication than disciplinary
    • refer to discussion on paradigmatic science
  • Porter et al. Specialization vs. Integration
    • quote "Research spirals inward; science cascades outward."
    • Specialization to Integration
      • hi - lo = disciplinarian
      • hi - hi = single interdisciplinary specialists (essentially empty)
      • lo - hi = renaissance integrator
      • lo - lo = grazer

    • paths to get there over your career
      • across and up - building up collaborations
      • straight across - specialize and integrate?

 

 

Innovation

Factors that contribute to innovative students/employees
  • multi-cultural, have lived in another country
  • cognitive flexibility in the face of ill-structured problems
  • speaks English - Richard Florida, creative people have access to a wealth of un-regulated information sources and wider range of business outlets
  • I shaped vs. T shaped
    • I shape career is deep and narrow
    • T shape is solid and broad exposure but also have an area of expertise

 

Diverse teams

  • Maybe you don't need to be interdisciplinary but you need to learn to work as part of a team?
  • Page 2007 notes
    • research data showing functional groups beating single geniuses
    • "Diversity Trumps Ability" hypothesis
    • works because of the superadditivity of tools, combinations of new approaches
    • when to copy when to innovate
    • diverse groups can avoid local optima
    • a person's ability to contribute increases if they can see the problem in multiple ways and can apply diverse heuristics
    • functional diversity - different tools
    • values diversity - see the problem differently
  • practical application - can hire and manage a diverse workgroup easier than you can hire and attend to a single star

 

Activities

1. summarize opinions on what makes a good interdisciplinary or integrative scientist and career

2. discuss proposed list of speakers

2. craft the questions that they might be expected to answer (framework)

 


Follow-up notes

from the discussion