The lists do NOT organize the aspects as directly horizontal contrasts - they are just lists. |
plus aspects
|
minus aspects
|
lack of authentic materials
|
rich in i + 1
|
failure to select authentic materials appropriately
|
easy to use same activity with various levels
|
can't standardize the learning process throughout
|
can standardize the learning process within smaller divisions
|
hard to assess with conventional tool
|
simulates real-world activities
|
most teachers not trained to do it
|
can involve native speakers who have specialized subject-area competence
|
expensive & cumbersome - all those props and supplies
|
students motivate more readily
|
publishers probably don't want to produce CBI textbooks
|
can create activities with a modular template
|
various stakeholders will gripe that there's not grammar / literature
|
can start with young learners
|
how relate to language requirements?
|
can help de-ghettoize second language programs
|
too specialized by topic - not all learners want to do the same topic
|
supports diversity, internationalization, interdisiplinary learning
|
group activities irritate many learners
|
produces better proficiency
|
introvert learners don't join in
|
supports different knowledges & strengths
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
added by WBF: negotiation of meaning
|