Cobb-Douglas: ln(Q) = β1 + β2ln(L) +
β3ln(K) + ε
CES: ln(Q) = β1 +
(β4/β3)ln(β2Lβ3 +
(1-β2)Kβ3) + ε
Where Q = VA/NFirm, L=Labor/NFirm, K=Capital/NFirm are per establishment data of value-added, labor, and capital, respectively. Both production functions may be generalized to consider variable rate of returns to scale as follows:
Generalized Cobb-Dougas: ln(Q) + θ Q = β1 + β2ln(L) +
β3ln(K) + ε
Generalized CES: ln(Q) + θ Q = β1 +
(β4/β3)ln(β2Lβ3 +
(1-β2)Kβ3) + ε
ln(Q) + β5 Q = β1 + (β4/β3)ln(β2Lβ3 + (1-β2)Kβ3) + ε
Using maximum likelihood method, formulate and estimate the parameter vector β = (β1, β2, β3, β4, β5)'. Perform hypothesis testings for β4 = 1 and β5 = 0 jointly based on Wald, Lagrangian Multiplier, and Likelihood Ratio tests.
ln(Q) + θ Q = β1 + β2ln(L) + β3ln(K) + ε
where Q = VA/NFirm, L=Labor/NFirm, K=Capital/NFirm are per establishment data of value-added, labor, and capital, respectively. We assume that the heteroscedastic variances take the following multiplicative form:
σi2 = σ2
hi(α) and
hi(α) = exp(Ziα)
where Zi = [ln(Li),ln(Ki)] and α = [α1,α2]'. Or, equivalently,
σi2 = σ2 Liα1 Kiα2
Formulate and estimate the log-likelihood function with multiplicative heteroscedasticity. Does the incorporation of heteroscedastic variances improve the model estimates of the generalized Cobb-Douglas production function?