Identify and analyze the presence of Foucault’s two notions of power, which
is “power over”
AND “power relations,” in regards to Carolyn
Merchant’s depiction of women and nature.
The writings of Foucault are complex and hard to understand when you read
them for the first time. Through out the term we have analyzed and identified
two of the notions of power found in Foucault’s writing, power over and
power relations. These two notions of power are as different as day
and night. One notion is very easy to identify and the other is not
so easily seen. Power over is dominance or conquering by physical
force, as power relations is not so harsh, it is not obvious. It
is power as a form of social discipline. Carolyn Merchant depicts
women as nature, and through my paper I will try to identify the two notions
of power discovered by Foucault in Carolyn Merchant and her depiction of
women and nature. I will use examples given by Carolyn Merchant and
show how one or the other form of power is related to the example.
In one of Carolyn Merchant’s work “The Death of Nature” she wrote something
that really didn’t make sense. “Women and nature have an age-old
association” (1980. pg. 268) this phrase was new to me and after we analyzed
in class how women are associated with nature, I realized that it could
be true. When women are associated with nature it shows a form of
power relations. The connection that I see between women and nature,
is the body. We have discussed in class how women are associated
with nature through there bodies. Since women give birth to children,
they reproduce. So does nature, and so women are associated with
nature. When the ground is ready to produce we call that fertile.
When women are ready to reproduce we also call that fertile. When
the ground can not give forth good fruit we call that barren. When
women are not able to give birth we also call that barren. There
are many associations in our culture between women and nature.
Power relations is being normalized through the body of women. When
we associate nature and women we have to have a transaction point which
is the body. Since women give birth, we shall say that that is what
they should do and nothing else. Since men are the head of the family
they should take care of all the problems and the ones making the money.
The reason that is, is because men are associated with culture. And
culture is civilized, reasonable, paid, and is male, or that is what we
think anyways. Now this is where we can see power relations.
No one says to the women “you are a women you have to stay home and cook
and clean and produce babies, but that is what we think they should do.
So power relations is being played out in this example. Now when
a man says to his wife this is what you are going to do and I will make
the money and you will do what I say and you will stay home, then power
over is taking place.
Ever since the world was created we have associated
women with nature. For example: nature is female, nature is nurturing,
and nature is wild, and so are females. One example is that we call
earth “Mother Earth.” Why?. Because earth reproduces, it nurtures,
and it cares, and so do females in our society. All of these characteristics
are associated with female because of the body which is a transition point
between females, and nature.
Written in Carolyn Merchant’s work is a phrase that seemed quite interesting
to me “In society, the ruling head must be a man, for a woman’s rule creates
a monster.” This phrase caught my eye because it seems that she is
saying that only men are capable of making rational decisions. Which
is definitely not true, there are many single mothers that are able to
raise a family by themselves and be a leader in society. The reason
I think this phrase is important is because we automatically assume that
women are not capable of being leaders. By automatically assuming
that are not capable is a form of power relations because we put them in
a lower bracket.
In a family the man and the wife should be on equal levels. Or that
is the way that I seem to see it. But men that are more ancient should
I say or more traditional don’t seem to see it like that. Men are
much better then women because men are civilized, reasonable and so on.
And since women give birth through there bodies, they are associated with
nature which is much lower than culture.
“Due to the Fall from the Garden of Eden (caused by the temptations of
woman), the human race lost its ‘dominion over creation’” (Merchant 1980:
pg. 273). Because women were first deceived in the Garden of Eden,
God made women the child bearer and that is what associated her with earth.
Up until the Fall of man there was no need for man or women to have power
over one another because they were all equal. But since women are
the first bite, God gave Adam, the man, power over the women. God
gave Adam the intelligence to be the head since he did not eat until the
women offered it to him. So this is how men became the head and when
were below.
As women and nature are associated through the bodies of women, men are
associated with culture, because of the ideas, and mentality. I have
realized that many things that are in this world are not true. I
think that both men and women when they come together as a family should
be on the same level. Not one higher then the other, or smarter.
They are both one. It says in the Bible that when man and woman shall
leave their parents they shall cling together and become one. When
women have babies it is not because she wanted to. It is because
both the man and the woman wanted to. And that child that is created
from both of them is both of them in one. And that is why man and
woman are on the same level.
Power, nature, and women, these are the topics that I have tried to identify
and analyze in my paper. I showed my ability to analyze them in the
articles of Carolyn Merchant. The notions of Foucault are as I stated
in the beginning, power over and power relations. These two notions
show up in the articles of Carolyn Merchant, and I tried to identify them
to the best of my ability. I hope it is enough to show my understanding
of these topics.
Works Cited
Lawrence D. Kritzman (2001). Michel Foucault,
On Power 101-106. Routledge
Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Carolyn Merchant (1980). Death of Nature, The,
Women as Nature 268-283. Harper
Collins Publishers, Inc.
Carolyn Merchant (1983). Death of Nature, The,
Nature as Disorder 126-149, 310-313.
Harper Collins Publishers, Inc.