Real Time
The tag line on the title really tells the crucial take home message
for education; through all our efforts to serve the student better we
are actually cultivating a situation where the student will never be satisified.
This is actually a good thing!
We are giving students access to tools and information that will help
them to make better decisions and will help them to take responsibility
for their educational experience. We need to make sure that these tools
provide some feedback to us on what students are looking for, what they
found and what they didn't find. The internet communications that we use
are fully capable of collecting this information and providing it back
to us. We don't want to just capture mouse clicks, we want to provide
them with the opportunities to give us information. It will help us to
involve them in a dialog.
Education is a different industry than most of the others discussed in
Real Time because our "customers" start out dissatisfied. They
are not dissatisfied with us (the university) but they have some level
of dissatisfaction with their current state in life that is driving them
to learn more or aquire new credentials. This is much different, for example,
from someone who sends their package via Federal Express and will be dissatisfied
only if you provide poor service. We need to recognize then that our students
are driven by dissatisfaction and we need to learn to channel that energy
into some positive force for the university.
The kernal of the idea in this book for us to take home is that as we
provide better, real time services and resources to the student, these
services will actually drive their level of dissatisfaction up. The "Real
Time" effect is that as they have more information and more responsibility,
they will expect more from us. We need to make sure channels are open
for them to tell us what they want.
One of the areas that I have seen the "Real Time effect" come
into play is in student services for transcripts and academic information.
The university may have thought that providing information over the web
and allowing registration on the web would reduce student discomfort over
course selection and help avoid registration problems. That happened,
but in addition the students have become much more demanding for information.
They do not appreciate the effort by the squads of people that put this
system together, they want new features and new powers. The university
should capitalize on this demand in two ways. First we should use the
demand for more personalized information on course selection to steer
students toward advising. I don't think we should try to put everything
on the web. Make them see an advisor and talk about courses, careers and
other aspects of academic life. The second thing the university must do
is to start tracking requested courses and schedules. For example. if
we know that 100 people requested a course that only allowed 40 in, and
we do nothing about it, that is a major loss for both the individual students
and the flow of the students. We may not be able to make immediate course
reassignments, but we should be able to use that data in course planning
and scheduling. Some schools require their students to submit a course
plan by the end of the Sophomore year, this is both a great advising tool
and a great curricular planning tool.
Another area where I have personally observed increased expectations
and thus higher level entry dissatisfaction is with course materials posted
to the internet. I used to be able to hand out the syllabus on the first
day of class. Then I published that same syllabus to the internet before
class started. I routinely get requests for the URL for my syllabus for
a course that I will be teaching next term (one or two months ahead of
time). The students have changed their expectations from,using the syllabus
as a schedule for the course, to using the syllabus to help decide whether
they want to sign up for the course in the first place. In some cases
I am able to refer them to the last version of the course with the warning
that it might be changed. In other cases, such as when I'm teaching a
new course. I don't think I'll ever be two months ahead.
This book provided some very interesting examples from industry for which
the lesson learned could be applied to education. I would recommend this
to anyone who is considering improving a process in education by relying
on the internet.
The book would help them understand that that improvement is just the
first step in a change in the way they look at service.
|