Concentration of Wealth in the USA

In America today wealth is distributed more unequally than in any industrial country. The top 1 percent of our population owns half the country's wealth. As for income, the bottom 20 percent take home a decreasing share and the top 20 percent take home an ever increasing portion of the total. The other side of the coin of the relentless fall in real wages is the end of the eight-hour-day. The workweek is near record levels since World War II; meanwhile, the share of the adult population either working or looking for work --what's described by economists as the labor force participation rate--is also at record levels.

Corporate behavior is largely to blame for the growing concentration of wealth that is one of the distinguishing features of our era. The expanding power of multinational corporations, the largest of which now have more economic clout than most nations--are fundamentally authoritarian, anti-union, pro-fascist and anti-democratic. Thus, they pose a growing threat to the ability of nations to protect their people and resources from uncontrolled exploitation. The 500 largest industrial corporations control 25 percent of the world's economic output but employ only one twentieth of one percent of the world's population. Corporations benefit disproportionately from economic globalization, often at the expense of individuals and communities.

What has happened in the United States is even more telling; even though profits are high, the Fortune 500 companies cut their payrolls by eliminating millions of jobs and helping to drag down middle-class incomes. Sales of the ten largest corporations exceeded the combined GNP of the 100 smallest countries and the top 300 transnationals owned some 25 percent of the world's productive assets.

Corporate decisions to cut jobs or relocate to low-wage, low-regulation countries therefore have a heavy impact on the global distribution of wealth. The millions of U.S. jobs that Fortune 500 companies shed while the average annual compensation of their chief executive officers by many millions of dollars. This was part of an ongoing process of shifting wealth from those who are engaged in the production of real value to those who already have large amounts of money. The result is a world where the income of the wealthiest 20 percent of the population is 200 times greater than that of the poorest 20 percent. In the past, such inequality has been a harbinger of economic instability, and social unrest, which leads to demagoguery, war and leaders who promise simple or "final" solutions.

During the 1920's, for example, 0.5 percent of the families in the United States controlled 32.4 percent of the total wealth--an inequity that was only reduced when the Great Depression dropped their share to 19.3 percent. Since then, the concentration of wealth has crept back up to a higher imbalance. Current trends are promoting not just economic insecurity but social unrest, terrorism, a growing stream of refugees across the globe, and environmental destruction.

For More Information on the Concentration of Wealth in the USA
Go to At Home on the Web
Go to Senior Citizen Web Pointer