Frankenstein?
I think in this book Mary Shelley are constructing the knowledge of Dr. Frankenstein. He did not deconstruct the knowledge; he
always run away from the problems
that he had been made. He did not tried to solve it by what the monster
asked him for. He left out
something that was very important.
He made the body come alive but he did not do anything to make things goes
well for the monster.
For example: if you trying to do something and you did make it to the end (good or happy result), why would you want to do it. You
going to make it worst in your hands.
Mary Shelley used
by her writing methods and the truth story of Dr. Frankenstein to describe
these constructions of knowledge. Dr.
Frankenstein constructed his personal thoughts through science. He interested in non-existed things can move. In his family, there was
always someone die, he was tired of his love ones had die. So one day in the University of Ingolstadt, he experienced himself to make
some people that had die to come alive. There were people that against what he wanted to do, but no one could stop him. He used the
raw material (human dead body) cut into pieces and make into one existing beings. After all he was afraid of his result, the result of his
was terribly devil. The monster was killing his brother and friends. He felt ashamed of himself; he tried to run away from the
problems. After all he gave
up for everything and he had die in the North Pole – Artic Sea.
Back <Response-Winter> Next