ORIENTALISM AND THE STUDY OF EAST ASIA



I. The myth of objectivity

A. periodization as bias

political history

intellectual history

economic history

social history

art history

B. revisionist history: it's not what Rush says it is

new facts

revisiting the past with new questions

history and the social sciences

ordinary people

gender and queer studies

minority studies

judging the past

how valid is it to do this?

whose standards do you use?

watching out for earlier judgements

the myth of the objective source

unreliable sources, six times removed

II. Orientalism and Asian history

A. Edward Said and the Middle East

the 19th century and "Oriental Studies"

racism as theory

the rhetoric of imperialism

exoticism and inscrutability

eroticism and the female Orient

eroticism and the female Oriental

slavery and other evils

B. 19th century assumptions about East Asia

Missionaries and non-Christian cultures

wrong and in need of salvation

from superior religion to superior culture

human rights and universal mores

amoral/immoral and irrational

non-exclusive beliefs

amorality: Shinto and folk Taoism

Zen and the non-rational mind

Salvationist Buddhism

Confucianism

fanaticism and superstition

the Japanese Emperor as a kami

the Taipings and the Boxers

stage history and "backward" cultures

Japan and China: "extended feudal stages"

the development of nationalism and capitalism

backward is better than racially inferior

the evils of patriarchy

look who's talking?

focus on specific practices

samurai women and commoners

the anti-footbinding campaign

arranged marriages

Asia as a woman to be possessed and protected

Japan: small, emotional and sensitive

China: irrational and hysterical



BREAK



III. Discussion groups