Lecture 6 Notes
- Stoichiometries of
Oxidative Phosphorylation
- Redox energy (ΔE), protonmotive
force (Δp), and ΔG
- Stoichiometry of the Electron
Transport Chain
- Stoichiometry of the ATP
Synthase
Stoichiometries of
Oxidative Phosphorylation
We know that passage of electrons down the ETS is
coupled to electrogenic proton ejection and that ATP synthesis is
driven by electrophoretic proton back-flux through the F1,F0 ATPase of
mitochondria. The stoichiometries of oxidative phosphorylation
answer the quantitative questions, how many protons are pumped per pair
of electrons moving through all or part of the ETS? How many
protons are required to synthesize one mole of ATP?
The quantities commonly dealt with in the literature
are H+/O, H+/P, and P/O ratios. Here, we will define these
quantites and explore their values.
Redox energy (ΔE),
protonmotive force (Δp), and ΔG
Recall from Lecture 3a that a charge (electron or
ion) moving through a voltage is a form of work, and a charge having
the potential to move through a voltage is a form of energy. The
general conversion between electrical force and energy is:
ΔG =
znFΔV
(1)
where ΔG is in J/mol, z is the valence, n is the number of charges
moved, and F is the Faraday (F = 96485.3415 Coulombs).
We can apply this equation to the electron transport
chain:
ΔG = -ne
FΔE
(2)
where the minus sign arises from the valency of an electron.
Recall that the redox energy, ΔE, for NADH to O is about 1.16 V and
that 2 electrons pass to O. Therefore,
ΔG = -2 x 96.485 x 1.16 = -216 kJ/mol
The energy of electron transport is transduced to the energy of an
electrochemical gradient of protons ΔμH+. In general, there will
be some losses in this energy transfer, so
nH+ΔμH+ ≤ ΔG
(3)
where nH+ = the H+/O stoichiometry of the electron transport chain.
Recall that protonmotive force is defined
Δp = - ΔμH+/F
(4)
Therefore, combining Eqns 2-4,
nH+Δp ≤ 2 ΔE
(5)
Stoichiometry of the
Electron Transport Chain
We can use values of Δpo from the mitochondrial
“battery curve” to estimate possible values of the H+/O
stoichiometry. Thus, for NADH to O, 2 ΔE
~ 2.32 V, and for succinate to O, 2 ΔE
~ 1.56 V. In both cases, the measured Δpo is
about 208 mV. Evidently, nH+ ≤ 11 for NADH to O,
and nH+ ≤ 7 for succinate to O.
During the 1970-1987 period, after the Chemiosmotic
Theory was accepted, many laboratories set out to determine these
fundamental quantities. (See Fig. 4.6 in Nicholls and Ferguson
for the experimental technique used by Mitchell and others). As you
have heard, Peter Mitchell advocated an H+/O stoichiometry of 6 for
NADH to O and 4 for succinate to O. Other laboratories, beginning
with Pressman and Azzone and going on with Lehninger and coworkers,
found much higher values by direct experiment. Interestingly, the
consensus values found in most textbooks today are 10 and 6.
However, Andrew Beavis, writing from my laboratory in 1987, has made a
very persuasive case that the correct values are 11 and 7 [1, 2].
Stoichiometry of the
ATP Synthase
ATP synthesis is driven by Δp, and we may write
nP
Δp ≥ ΔGP /F
(6)
where nP is the H+/P stoichiometry (number of protons required to
synthesize one mole of ATP) and ΔGP is the “phosphorylation
potential”, the free energy of ATP synthesis.
When ATP is synthesized in the matrix, it must exit via the adenine
nucleotide translocase (ANT), which catalyzes 1:1 exchange of ATP for
external ADP with movement of one anionic charge outward. This
electrophoretic transporter therefore requires an additional proton to
be pumped out electrogenically. (The proton is restored by influx
of phosphate, essentially as phosphoric acid). Consequently, if
we consider cytosolic ΔGP, nP refers to the sum of the protons ejected
to drive ATP synthesis and the proton ejected to drive ATP/ADP exchange.
If we take ΔGP (cytosolic) = 62 kJ/mol and Δp ~ 200 mV, it
follows that
nP
≥ 3.2
(7)
The consensus view has been that nP
= 4.
We may now combine these ratios to obtain a quantity
that can be estimated independently, namely the P/O ratio.
P/O = nH+ / nP
The consensus numbers follow from 10 and 6 for nH . That is, the
P/O ratio for NADH is 2.5 and that for succinate is 1.5.
Interestingly, Beavis and Lehninger measured P/O ratios independently
and obtained values of 2.75 and 1.75 [3, 4]. These values are of
course consistent with Beavis’ H+/O stoichiometries of 11 and 7,
described above.
(Albert Lehninger, who was my Professor of Biochemistry in Medical
School, died on March 4, 1986).
1. Beavis, A. D. (1987) Upper and
lower limits of the charge translocation stoichiometry of mitochondrial
electron transport. J Biol Chem 262, 6165-73.
2. Beavis, A. D. (1987) Upper and
lower limits of the charge translocation stoichiometry of cytochrome c
oxidase. J Biol Chem 262, 6174-81.
3. Beavis, A. D. and Lehninger, A.
L. (1986) The upper and lower limits of the mechanistic stoichiometry
of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Stoichiometry of oxidative
phosphorylation. Eur J Biochem 158, 315-22.
4. Beavis, A. D. and Lehninger, A.
L. (1986) Determination of the upper and lower limits of the
mechanistic stoichiometry of incompletely coupled fluxes. Stoichiometry
of incompletely coupled reactions. Eur J Biochem 158, 307-14.