John S. Ott (c2019, 2020.
2021, 2024)
Department of History
Portland State University
HST 354U - Early Medieval Europe
Reading
Guide 6:
(1) Carolingian documents (Einhard, Saxon Capitulary, Pepin's
Anointing);
(2) Dhuoda, Manual for Her Son;
Alcuin's Poems, Freculf's dedication of his book
Background to the
readings
on Carolingian law and politics
For today's class we are reading across a number of quite different
historical texts.
- 'The Elevation of Pepin the
Short' is in fact a selection of yearly entries in a work known
as the Annales of the Kingdom of the Franks (or Royal
Frankish Annals). The entries, for 750, 751, and 754,
describe in a summary fashion some of the important steps in
establishment of a new royal dynasty, the Carolingians. As we will see,
the ancestors of the first Carolingian king, Pepin (or Pippin, either
is fine) 'the Short', had been ruling the kingdom of the Franks in fact
if not in name for some time prior to 751. This brief texts offers an
'official' accounting of the
transition from one Frankish regime to another.
- 'The Reanointing of Pepin in
754' is a narrative text better known as the 'Little Clause on
Pepin's Anointing.' It dates to 767 -- so some 15 years after the
events it describes -- and exists as an addition to a book of Gregory
of Tours' miracle stories. It describes a second anointing of Pepin,
this time with his sons, Carloman and Charles (Charlemagne) in 754.
- 'Pope Stephen Scolds
Charlemagne and Carloman' offers the text of a papal letter from
Pope Stephen III (r. 768-772), and was composed in 769 or 770.
Charlemagne and Desiderata (or Ermengarde), the daughter of
the Lombard king Desiderius (d. c. 786), were in fact married in 770.
By
this marriage, Charlemagne secured an alliance with a political rival
bordering Carloman’s half of the Frankish kingdom. It seems probable
that Charlemage accomplished this with his mother Bertrada’s knowledge
and aid. Not long after, Carloman (b. 751), the younger of the two
brothers, died in 771.
It is clear from the letter that Stephen does not know which brother
has
been lined up to marry Desiderata (it was Charles); he also warns them
against giving their sister, Gisela, to one of Desiderius’s sons.
Charles set Desiderata aside after one year of marriage (Einhard, c.
18), perhaps because his political strategy re: the Lombards had
changed.
- Einhard's Life of Charlemagne (in Latin, the Vita
Karoli) is the most important biography composed concerning
Charles,
and is an invaluable piece of Carolingian historiography. It is also
the
first purely secular biography (excluding Ammianus' portrait of Emperor
Valens) that we have read this term. Einhard was a courtier who entered
Charles' service late in the emperor's life, and who then also served
under
his son, Louis. He wrote the Life in 826, twelve years after
the emperor's death in 814. It presents a carefully
constructed depictions of the transfer of power from the Merovingian to
Carolingian Franks. Note, however, that this portrayal should be read
as
an 'official' rendering of events, and thus treated with care. Einhard
was
deeply educated and part of a circle of literate elites, court
officials,
and ecclesiastical leaders. The Roman historian Suetonius' work on the
lives
of the caesars was one textual model he utilized in writing his account.
- 'The Capitulary on the Saxon
Territories' was a law code promulgated between 775 and 790 to
address the neighboring Saxon territories, against which Charlemagne
campaigned off and on for some three decades. It gives us an idea of
how the extension of Carolingian power into neighboring territories was
carried out following the armed suppression of Saxon resistance. Note
that the Saxons were newly Christianized, and that Saxony had been and
remained an active zone for the efforts of Christian missionaries, many
originally from Britain, in the
eighth and early ninth centuries.
Questions
1) As you read the short accounts that start our
readings, keep an eye on how each legitimizes the Caroligian ascent to
power. How do they stress Carolingian political legitimacy? Why do you
think
the first Carolingians (Pepin and his sons) sought papal affirmation of
their coup?
2) Why might the pope(s) have taken a direct interest
in the dynastic succession of the Carolingians? How does Stephen try to
sway the marriage decision-making of Charles and Carloman? Did the
Carolingians need the pope more than the other way around?
3) How does Einhard organize his biography of
Charles? With what does he begin the account, and in what order does he
arrange its details? Why?
4) Using Einhard's biography and the Saxon capitulary
as a starting point, how might we characterize the king/emperor’s place
in his empire? What are his duties? What are his
expectations of his subjects? What is the role of the church and
its officials to
be?
5) What role did the Christianization of the Saxons
play in the assertion of Carolingian political and legal authority over
the Saxon territory? How does the process of conversion compare in this
document
to other conversion accounts we have seen, such as the Life of
Martin?
Background to readings on medieval emotion
(Dhuoda, Alcuin)
Dhuoda may have been the daughter of Sancho I, the duke of
Gascony, although this is uncertain. She and Bernard of Septimania --
the duke of Septimania (southwestern France), count of Barcelona, and
the godson of
Emperor Louis 'the Pious' (r. 814-840), Charlemagne's son and successor
-- were married in 824 at Aachen. William was born in 826; a second
son,
Bernard, in 841. In 829, Bernard (the Elder) was appointed Louis'
chamberlain,
essentially second only to the emperor, and Louis' young son Charles
was
entrusted to his protection and care. While at court, Bernard was
quickly
caught up in intrigue and became the subject of rumors that he was
having
an affair with Louis' second wife, the Empress Judith. Although
he fled the palace and his enemies, over the course of the next
fifteen years Bernard was stripped of his office and plotted with and
against
Louis and his son, Charles the Bald (r. 840-877).
In the course of these intrigues, in 841, Dhuoda learned that her
husband had given over their son, William, as a hostage to Charles the
Bald in order to secure Bernard, her husband’s, good conduct. Shortly
afterward, Dhuoda's infant son (Bernard) was taken from her as well.
Both Bernard (and William) were dispossessed of their offices by
Charles in 842. It was during this
time of tumultuous civil war that she dictated and sent the Manual
to her son William in 842/43. Shortly after, in 844, Charles the Bald
had her husband
executed. William, who subsequently rebelled against Charles, was
eventually killed by Charles' supporters in Barcelona in 850. The date
of Dhuoda's
death is uncertain.
The Manual is an exceptional source from the early Middle
Ages,
composed as it was by an elite laywoman. In form and content, it draws
from
existing genres (including Mirrors for Princes) and models of Christian
motherhood. There can be little doubt as to Dhuoda's emotional
suffering
at being cut off from her children, however. The Manual survives
in only a couple of much later manuscript copies.
Alcuin of York (735-804) was the leading scholar and
intellectual of the Carolingian court school under Charlemagne. He came
to Charles' attention while both were in Italy in 781, and was
recruited to lead the palace school from 782-790 and from 792-800. He
was responsible for educating both Charles and his children, and was
the architect of many educational reforms. He was also a polymath and
prolific writer. Hundreds of his letters survive, along with poems,
works on grammar, theology, rhetoric, astronomy, mathematics, and
poetry. He trained many of the leading intellectuals of the next two
generations, and was made abbot of Marmoutier, outside Tours.
Questions
(1) How, and in what circumstances, did medieval
people express emotion? What emotions are portrayed in our texts? When
are they given license to be expressed?
(2) Do Dhuoda and Alcuin feel a similar sense of
responsibility to their dependents (children and students)? If so, what
is the nature of that responsibility? What do they expect in return?
(3) How does the expression of emotion in our
readings compare with expressions of emotion – private and/or personal
– in public life in modern U.S. culture?
(4) How would you characterize the kinds of moral
education Dhuoda and Alcuin seek to instill in their dependents (we'll
follow up on Carolingian learning next week, too)?